The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Lifespan of humans?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Gamemasters -> Lifespan of humans? Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10286
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naaman wrote:
Species that live for multiple centuries (Wookiees, according to WotC live 400-ish years, for example) cause problems with suspension of disbelief.

The only way to mitigate this, IMHO, is to reduce the intelligence AND fertility of such species so as to explain why they haven't made human beings obsolete. Such a long life would allow for individuals to have multiple dozens of offspring, thus propagating the galaxy at enormous rates...

Not that it necessarily matters, but consider life on this planet. There are precious few species that have a longer life expectancy that human beings. Even without advanced medical care, humans could reasonably expect to live far longer than almost any animal that dies of "old" age.

Also, for what its worth, the human life span being "extended" by things like medical care obeys the law of averages: just because someone dies from sickness or injury does not mean that his original life expectancy was not 100 years or more. In other words, medical care doesn't really improve life expectancy. It just reduces the number of people who die prematurely, thereby increasing the average age of death.

That's all life expectancy is, an average. And actually here on Earth there are more than a precious few non-clonal species living longer than humans, and some species even experience biological immortality.

I strongly disagree that Yoda's species, Hutts and even Wookiees are less intelligent than Humans. Now less fertile, I can definitely go with that. Even long-lived species may have short-lived fertility periods in their life cycles. I think there's another huge factor in Human galactic dominancy. Human population on Earth has quickly grown exponentially here on our planet (Human population has increased by over 3 billion people in my own lifetime here, so far). Imagine that on a galactic scale. Humans may be the most prominent species in the galaxy simply because they became wide-spread earliest. If there were more Humans with FTL capability at the beginning of the Republic, then they could spread out to new planets uninhabited by other sentient species and then explode in population on each Human colony. By the time a lot more species had a change to spread around, there weren't nearly as many habitable planets left to colonize, so most of the places they could go to already had thriving Human populations. So a lot of these longer lived species may not be any less intelligent, but there are just too many Humans everywhere to be rendered obsolete. Just look at how many planets in the Star Wars galaxy that are primarily "Human planets". For most of those, I would say that Humans just got there first.
_________________
*
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14022
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

IMO its a mix. Take a look at Elves in ADND for instance.. They have a LONG gestation period for births AS well as a low fertility rate.. Its rare for them to have more than 3 kids. Compare that to some of the lower age races, that can have dozens..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zarn
Force Spirit


Joined: 17 Jun 2014
Posts: 698

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

.

.


Last edited by Zarn on Mon May 13, 2019 1:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naaman
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 3191

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whill wrote:
Naaman wrote:
Species that live for multiple centuries (Wookiees, according to WotC live 400-ish years, for example) cause problems with suspension of disbelief.

The only way to mitigate this, IMHO, is to reduce the intelligence AND fertility of such species so as to explain why they haven't made human beings obsolete. Such a long life would allow for individuals to have multiple dozens of offspring, thus propagating the galaxy at enormous rates...

Not that it necessarily matters, but consider life on this planet. There are precious few species that have a longer life expectancy that human beings. Even without advanced medical care, humans could reasonably expect to live far longer than almost any animal that dies of "old" age.

Also, for what its worth, the human life span being "extended" by things like medical care obeys the law of averages: just because someone dies from sickness or injury does not mean that his original life expectancy was not 100 years or more. In other words, medical care doesn't really improve life expectancy. It just reduces the number of people who die prematurely, thereby increasing the average age of death.

That's all life expectancy is, an average. And actually here on Earth there are more than a precious few non-clonal species living longer than humans, and some species even experience biological immortality.

I strongly disagree that Yoda's species, Hutts and even Wookiees are less intelligent than Humans. Now less fertile, I can definitely go with that. Even long-lived species may have short-lived fertility periods in their life cycles. I think there's another huge factor in Human galactic dominancy. Human population on Earth has quickly grown exponentially here on our planet (Human population has increased by over 3 billion people in my own lifetime here, so far). Imagine that on a galactic scale. Humans may be the most prominent species in the galaxy simply because they became wide-spread earliest. If there were more Humans with FTL capability at the beginning of the Republic, then they could spread out to new planets uninhabited by other sentient species and then explode in population on each Human colony. By the time a lot more species had a change to spread around, there weren't nearly as many habitable planets left to colonize, so most of the places they could go to already had thriving Human populations. So a lot of these longer lived species may not be any less intelligent, but there are just too many Humans everywhere to be rendered obsolete. Just look at how many planets in the Star Wars galaxy that are primarily "Human planets". For most of those, I would say that Humans just got there first.


All great points, Whill.

I was actually saying that the way it is in SW right now is rather silly, IMO (particularly in response to the notion that a given species would have a shorter life span than humans). My fix would have been what you see in my first post, there. But since I was late to the making-Star-Wars-party, I just deal with it as is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whill
Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 10286
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naaman, Lucas started it by making Chewbacca 200 years old in 1976. Lucas also made Yoda 900 years old. I'm not sure but I think WEG may be the ones that set Jabba at being 600 years old. So it is what it is now.

Zarn, I'm down with the 'ancient aliens' genetic modifications too. And yes, Wookiee's preferred natural environment being a more dangerous one could be a factor. So Humans still be may be more adaptable overall by living in a wider variety of environments. Hutts are fairly widespread (not like Humans, but still). I imagine in the Hutt culture there is quite a lot of them killing off each other in their rise to the top of their enterprises. And Hutts need "lesser" species so wouldn't make them obsolete.
_________________
*
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Naaman
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 3191

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL! I see what happened there. Very Happy The "right now" in my post was referring to the status quo as established in 1976. In other words, it was "right now" as opposed future modifications made by a GM who actually worries about these things. I wasn't implying that it somehow got this way over time.

But yeah... I just deal with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrNexx
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Posts: 2248
Location: San Antonio

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought the EU explanation for Wookies was the Rakata?
_________________
"I've Seen Your Daily Routine. You Are Not Busy!"
“We're going to win this war, not by fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”
http://rpgcrank.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16163
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrNexx wrote:
I thought the EU explanation for Wookies was the Rakata?

I would've thought the Celestials would be a more likely choice.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14022
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing we would need to look at is what attribute/skill shifts come from reaching say old age, venerable age etc...
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zarn
Force Spirit


Joined: 17 Jun 2014
Posts: 698

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.

.


Last edited by Zarn on Mon May 13, 2019 1:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dic1
Cadet
Cadet


Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 24
Location: Sydney, Australlia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe human supremacy is just a matter of birth rate.
we just breed so damn fast compared to the other sentient species we win out by numbers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Gamemasters All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0