The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Fire Linked?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Official Rules -> Fire Linked? Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Samp
Ensign
Ensign


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:33 am    Post subject: Fire Linked? Reply with quote

I have a quick question. In the core book it talks about fire linked weapons. The example they give is the X-wing with its 6D total. I assume that means that each time it fires it does 6D damage, and all 4 guns shoot at once.

The problem I have is the Z-95 headhunter. It has 2 fire linked triple blasters. They do 3D damage. So is that just 3D damage total? That seems kind of a small amount of damage. Here are the stats for the headhunter:

Type: Multi-purpose starfi ghter
Scale: Starfi ghter
Length: 11.8 meters
Skill: Starfi ghter piloting: Z-95
Crew: 1
Crew Skill: Starfi ghter piloting 3D+2, starship gunnery
3D+2, starship shields 3D+1
Cargo Capacity: 85 kilograms
Consumables: 1 day
Cost: 45,000 (used)
Maneuverability: 1D
Space: 7
Atmosphere: 400; 1,150 km/h
Hull: 4D
Shields: 1D
Sensors:
Passive: 15/0D
Scan: 25/1D
Search: 40/2D
Focus: 1/2D

Weapons:
2 Triple Blasters (fi re linked)
Fire Arc: Front
Skill: Starship gunnery
Fire Control: 1D
Space Range: 1-5/10/17
Atmosphere Range: 100-500/1/1.7 km
Damage: 3D

Concussion Missiles
Fire Arc: Front
Skill: Missile weapons: concussion missiles
Fire Control: 1D
Space Range: 1/3/7
Atmosphere Range: 30-100/300/700 m
Damage: 7D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gry Sarth
Jedi


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 5304
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, that's exactly what it means, both cannons firing together do 3D damage. Understand that the Z-95 is a pretty old and somewhat crappy starfighter, so it's really not powerful at all.
_________________
"He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eiren
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 169
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gry Sarth wrote:
Yeah, that's exactly what it means, both cannons firing together do 3D damage. Understand that the Z-95 is a pretty old and somewhat crappy starfighter, so it's really not powerful at all.


Yeah I was always under the impression that the Z-95's only real offensive threat was it's missiles, and that the triple blasters were more for deterrence and for smaller craft like airspeeders and such.
_________________
"Could someone please Jury-Rig my Wookiee?!"

Troops: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO6rqAJ3mGc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matthias777
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 1835
Location: North Carolina, USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought that the damage was too low, really. But that's the way it was statted out. While it is old and second-rate compared to anything newer, it's still supposed to be somewhat viable in space combat. It just seems that 4D would make more sense, and still be far below the damage of, say, an X-wing or TIE fighter.
_________________
Arek | Kage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
masque
Captain
Captain


Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 626
Location: Houston, TX

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the EU stuff, there was a very long series of developments for the headhunter, usually improving on the older models. You can always improve the stats and call it a later model.
_________________
Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
noctum_carpe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 2466
Location: Lidköping, Sweden

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or had them update the trippleblasters for something else.
_________________
http://selarips.free.fr/wookieetranslator/

You may fire when ready
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That to me is why the damage is so low, since they are just triple blasters, not laser cannons.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
masque
Captain
Captain


Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 626
Location: Houston, TX

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wookieepedia has a pretty detailed entry on the Headhunter, along with a list of armaments in the sidebar. http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Z-95_Headhunter

The Mark I is the one with the swing wings, bubble canopy, and the triple blasters, along with 2 concussion missile launchers. This is the kind Han uses in Han Solo at Star's End, while defending Doc's base. It also gives a description of a later version, the Z-95-AF4 has two fire-linked KX5 laser cannons, (same as the Y-Wing) as well as one concussion missile launcher. This is the version that looks like an X-Wing in cruise mode.

So I'd just use the later version, myself.
_________________
Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Samp
Ensign
Ensign


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the help. I was playing with my bro to help balance a encounter I was thinking of using (or at the very least have ready in case the need arises) and it just seemed like the headhunter was useless against the YT-2400 (4D hull 1D shield).

I think I will try to use a later version. At the very least I might bump the damage to 4D and call it a modified version. I don't want to kill the party, but I don't want them to feel invincible.

Also the party does not have much added to the flying tech skills, so I wanted something that would not be impossible for someone with only 3D in tech to hit.

-edit:

Oh wow, I didn't know it was pre-clone war. That ship has some darn good longevity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
masque
Captain
Captain


Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 626
Location: Houston, TX

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Samp wrote:

Oh wow, I didn't know it was pre-clone war. That ship has some darn good longevity.

The YT-1300 is pre-clone war, as well. You can actually see one in one of the prequels.
_________________
Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Golbez
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 102
Location: Fort McMurray Alberta Canada

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

masque wrote:
Samp wrote:

Oh wow, I didn't know it was pre-clone war. That ship has some darn good longevity.

The YT-1300 is pre-clone war, as well. You can actually see one in one of the prequels.


Just as much screen time as ET Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matthias777
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 1835
Location: North Carolina, USA

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

masque wrote:
The YT-1300 is pre-clone war, as well. You can actually see one in one of the prequels.

More specifically, it's the Millennium Falcon, according to GL. The Millennium Falcon itself was constructed in 60 BBY.
_________________
Arek | Kage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gry Sarth
Jedi


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 5304
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, I think masque was referring to the YT-1300s seen landed on the Naboo spaceport in Episode II. The Millenium Falcon is only seen in Ep3, and thus, at the end of the clone wars.
_________________
"He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them."


Last edited by Gry Sarth on Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hisham
Commander
Commander


Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Posts: 432
Location: Malaysia

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gry Sarth wrote:
Actually, I think maque was referring to the YT-1300s seen landed on the Naboo spaceport in Episode II.

IIRC there were two side by side on Naboo.
_________________
The Enteague Sector | Cracken's Collection of Crackpots
In D6, of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matthias777
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 1835
Location: North Carolina, USA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gry Sarth wrote:
Actually, I think masque was referring to the YT-1300s seen landed on the Naboo spaceport in Episode II. The Millenium Falcon is only seen in Ep3, and thus, at the end of the clone wars.

Actually I didn't even remember seeing any in Ep. II, it's been so long. I'll keep an eye out for them when I watch it again. Embarassed
_________________
Arek | Kage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Official Rules All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0