The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Capital Ships and Capital Missiles - a great Combination?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> Capital Ships and Capital Missiles - a great Combination? Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
denderan marajain
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 May 2014
Posts: 213
Location: Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:29 am    Post subject: Capital Ships and Capital Missiles - a great Combination? Reply with quote

Ì always ask myself why so many capital ship do not have Missile Launchers?

- they deal great Damage

- They can be fire-linked for a massive attack

I am looking for "answers"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cause to fire a projectile, means they need to drop their particle shields (dropping their Hull rating) when they fire. So if someone times their salvo at the firing ship just right, they can catch them with their pants down. Also missiles are no where as good a range as turbos etc.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One would think the same would be true of energy cannon fire; shields block incoming cannon fire but the RAW makes no mention of how shields interact with outbound cannon fire.

My feel was that it had more to do with ammunition supply, in that blaster gas could be stored in compressed form and thus require much less volume of storage for equivalent energy delivered. Missiles would still have their uses, but they would be much more of a silver bullet weapon used against high value targets, or for things like orbital bombardment.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jmanski
Arbiter-General (Moderator)


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 2065
Location: Kansas

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny the VSD has missiles but none of the other Star Destroyers do, IIRC.
_________________
Blasted rules. Why can't they just be perfect?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jmanski wrote:
Funny the VSD has missiles but none of the other Star Destroyers do, IIRC.

The SSD has them too
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Kirkler
Sub-Lieutenant
Sub-Lieutenant


Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 51
Location: BC Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well if a Star Fighter can fire a missile with out loosing it's shields would it not make sense that a Cap Ship could do the same. I think it has to do with space for ammo. If you look at the weak point of Naval ships it's allways the Magazine. That's what sunk the HMS Hood. One shot from the Bismark into the Magazine and no more hood.
_________________
Only the good die young? What about Wedge, he's good and still alive!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
aegisflashfire
Commander
Commander


Joined: 24 Mar 2014
Posts: 298
Location: Cincinnati, OH

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Capital ships canonically DO lose shields when they fire torpedos.

Clone Wars Episode Cat & Mouse
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Cat_and_Mouse

emphasis mine...
Quote:
Anakin contacts Obi-Wan, who explains that Trench's war record confirms his threat: he has defeated ships with cloaking devices before, but mostly in cruiser to cruiser engagements. In all previous cases, Trench used tracking torpedoes to destroy the enemy whether or not their ship was cloaked. Since none of the ships Trench has faced before were as small as the stealth ship (since ships this small don't usually have a cloaking device), Anakin guesses that Trench locks the torpedoes onto an enemy ship's magnetic signature. On board the Invincible, Trench's tactical droid calculates that the Jedi will not turn back as the admiral suggested. Trench agrees, stating that a stealth ship could have slipped past the blockade, but this Jedi chose to attack instead. Sensing a way to use this against him, Anakin attacks again; the stealth ship's torpedoes are again ineffective, but this time Trench is able to lock onto the stealth ship's magnetic signature and fires tracking torpedoes, despite his tactical droid's warning that doing so requires them to lower the ship's shields.

_________________
http://swfallingstar.podbean.com
GM of Falling Star: D6 Star Wars Campaign Podcast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Credits. Missiles are far more expensive than turbolaser blasts, and it's more economical to mount massive turbolasers (ISD primary turrets, for example) than batteries of missiles which, according to RAW are difficult to use on moving targets anyways. Capital missiles really only make sense on small capitals like the Corellian Gunship, or base delta zero bombardment platforms.
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier

Complete Starship Construction System
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
denderan marajain
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 13 May 2014
Posts: 213
Location: Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Cause to fire a projectile, means they need to drop their particle shields (dropping their Hull rating) when they fire. So if someone times their salvo at the firing ship just right, they can catch them with their pants down. Also missiles are no where as good a range as turbos etc.

Where Do i find this rule?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuclearwookiee
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some good answers here already. From a practical perspective, it seems to be largely era-dependent as well. During the Imperial era, the Empire was the only outfit that could really afford missiles, but it also had next to no need for them. When your baseline ISD is already unmatched in power, what's the point? An ISD's turbolaser compliment was enough to shred any other capital ships (up until the Alliance was able to field MC80s). An ISD was also sufficient when it came to most planetary bombardment scenarios. And for those few hold-out worlds that actually had planetary shields that needed breaking, the Empire could always roll out some of its old Victory destroyers.

Meanwhile, the cost made missiles prohibitive for the Alliance to use. Besides, the Alliance was highly protective of its precious few cruisers and likely would not have wanted to risk exposing its cruisers in the midst of combat by dropping particle shields.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

denderan marajain wrote:
garhkal wrote:
Cause to fire a projectile, means they need to drop their particle shields (dropping their Hull rating) when they fire. So if someone times their salvo at the firing ship just right, they can catch them with their pants down. Also missiles are no where as good a range as turbos etc.

Where Do i find this rule?


Page 126 revised book under shields..

Quote:
Starship shields are electronic energy dampers
which help absorb some of the damage from enemy
attacks. Shields come in two main varieties: particle
and energy/ray shields.
Particle shields deflect all sorts of physical objects,
including asteroids, missiles and proton torpedoes.
They are used at all times, except when a ship launches
fighters, missiles or torpedoes (the shields must be
dropped to allow physical objects to pass through
them). When a ship lowers its particle shields, reduce
its hull code by -2D. (A ship which loses its main power
generator also loses its particle shields.)

_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuclearwookiee
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So what are the odds of actually sneaking a hit in when a ship drops its shields to fire torpedoes? I'm guessing it only takes a reaction use of the relevant Shields skill to raise them in time anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I usually just ignore the particle shields rule and assume that the shields are synchronized to "flicker" and allow a shot through. A lucky shot getting through during the flicker would be explained away as the result of a poor soak roll by the targeted ship.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
thedemonapostle
Commander
Commander


Joined: 02 Aug 2011
Posts: 257
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

id imagine that the missile/torpedo firing ship doesnt need to drop all the shields on the firing arc the projectiles are coming from, maybe only around the missile/torpedo tube and no where else. iirc star wars shields arent like star trek shields.
_________________
Aim low, shoot high
I'm a pirate, need I say more?

d6holocron.com: Thedemonapostle

Thedemonapostle Star Wars Crossovers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
aegisflashfire
Commander
Commander


Joined: 24 Mar 2014
Posts: 298
Location: Cincinnati, OH

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You would think that, but the events of "Cat and Mouse" clearly establish that a capital ship needs to completely lower shields to fire missiles, and once you do it takes a moment before they can be re-established.

In other words, it a Clone Wars cartoon written 15 years after that book was published, locks in the D6 game mechanics as canon. which is pretty cool.
_________________
http://swfallingstar.podbean.com
GM of Falling Star: D6 Star Wars Campaign Podcast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0