| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject: Size |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I'm not sure which forum to put this in as it's not character related, ship related, or equipment related. But does anyone know a way to figure out a creatures size in meters when it's not listed? _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Nefasius Lieutenant Commander
 
  
 
 Joined: 18 Jun 2009
 Posts: 180
 Location: New Zealand
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:55 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Depends, perhaps by relativity to human size? or by Wookiepedia? _________________
 www.imperialentanglements.org
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:40 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Wookieepedia is out, I actually tried there before I asked the question. I guess relativity to human size is going to have to do. _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Nefasius Lieutenant Commander
 
  
 
 Joined: 18 Jun 2009
 Posts: 180
 Location: New Zealand
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:45 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Yeah, we might have to create another pit guide for it haha. 
 Something along the lines of Epic,8m+
 Monstrous, 6-8m
 Huge, 4-6m
 Large,2.5-4m
 Average,1.5-2.5m
 Small,.5-1.5m
 Tiny, microscopic-.5m
 _________________
 www.imperialentanglements.org
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:53 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Definitly something I prefered with WEG. Size was at least something you might get in terms of meters so you had a better idea how big something was (though it might not always be listed). I mean all this tiny, huge, average, etc. is kinda useless as far as I'm concerned cause their just descriptive of a size. I really wish Wookieepedia had this but sadly not everything has a listed size so they can't give a size range and sometime have to resort to just descriptive of the size. _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ankhanu Vice Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 13 Oct 2006
 Posts: 3089
 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:37 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Generally, if a size isn't given, I assume they're human range; 1.5-1.8m average. _________________
 Hotaru no Hishou; a messageboard about games, friends and nothing at all.
 
 Donate to Ankhanu Press
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:24 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I don't think it's human average in this case, Ankhanu. This is the creature that spawned this question, a kiltik. 
 
   
 In case you haven't seen Tales of the Jedi: Redemption, the Jedi on the left is the Twi'lek Tott Donetta and on the right is the Cathar Sylvar. The average Cathar is between 1.5 and 1.9 meters and the average Twi'lek is between 1.6 and 2.4 meters And the kiltik looks to be bigger than both Jedi.
 _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Gry Sarth Jedi
 
  
 Joined: 25 May 2004
 Posts: 5304
 Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:41 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Wizards lists it as "Giant", so clearly we shouldn't assume it to be average human-sized. _________________
 "He's Gry Sarth, of course he has the stats for them."
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ankhanu Vice Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 13 Oct 2006
 Posts: 3089
 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:58 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Hmm, I'd probably put that guy at about 3m tall...  it almost looks to be as wide and long as tall too. _________________
 Hotaru no Hishou; a messageboard about games, friends and nothing at all.
 
 Donate to Ankhanu Press
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:47 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Again, this is why I hate WotC's sizing vs. WEG's. I mean in the PbP I've got here the NPC character Giric I keep describing as being a giant and when I convert meters to feet he's a little over three feet taller than the tallest PC. So everyone looks up to him cause he towers well above them. But if a kiltik is three meters tall then it's only a few inches taller than Giric. If Giric is being PC'd I'm not about to say the kiltik is a giant to him cause it's only a little larger than he is. 
 I've got nothing against being descriptive of size, I just like to know what a size is in comparison to folks before I start being descriptive. Like if I were to have both the KAWD and Giric go up against a kiltik I'd tell one player that the creature's a giant cause to them it is while the other I'd tell them it's a little larger than they are for the same reason. Better to know what the size difference is before starting to get descriptive.
 _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Raven Redstar Rear Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 10 Mar 2009
 Posts: 2648
 Location: Salem, OR
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:15 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| You could call it very large... >.> <.< Even if it's only a few inches taller, it's probably 3-4x longer than the player.  So it does have more size, just not vertically.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| ZzaphodD Rear Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 28 Nov 2009
 Posts: 2426
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:21 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Hellcat wrote: |  	  | Again, this is why I hate WotC's sizing vs. WEG's. I mean in the PbP I've got here the NPC character Giric I keep describing as being a giant and when I convert meters to feet he's a little over three feet taller than the tallest PC. So everyone looks up to him cause he towers well above them. But if a kiltik is three meters tall then it's only a few inches taller than Giric. If Giric is being PC'd I'm not about to say the kiltik is a giant to him cause it's only a little larger than he is. | 
 
 What species is Giric? If it is a bipedal species then a giant bug the same height should definitely be described as a giant, if not huge.
 
 If you think this bug 10 feets high, then it should be at least 25 feet long!
 
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Esoomian High Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Oct 2003
 Posts: 6207
 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:10 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Hellcat wrote: |  	  | Like if I were to have both the KAWD and Giric go up against a kiltik I'd tell one player that the creature's a giant cause to them it is while the other I'd tell them it's a little larger than they are for the same reason. Better to know what the size difference is before starting to get descriptive. | 
 
 So we better be stocking up on bug spray then :p
 _________________
 Don't waste money on expensive binoculars.
 
 Simply stand closer to the object you wish to view.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| atgxtg Rear Admiral
 
  
  
 Joined: 22 Mar 2009
 Posts: 2460
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:04 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I've got a table around somewhere for creature sizes. It is based on the sqaure-cube law and is something I'm working on for creature design. 
 If it would help, I could post it. It's a bit rough, but it does give a progression between size (length, mass) and STR.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hellcat Grand Moff
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Jul 2004
 Posts: 11921
 Location: New England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:29 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | ZzaphodD wrote: |  	  |  	  | Hellcat wrote: |  	  | Again, this is why I hate WotC's sizing vs. WEG's. I mean in the PbP I've got here the NPC character Giric I keep describing as being a giant and when I convert meters to feet he's a little over three feet taller than the tallest PC. So everyone looks up to him cause he towers well above them. But if a kiltik is three meters tall then it's only a few inches taller than Giric. If Giric is being PC'd I'm not about to say the kiltik is a giant to him cause it's only a little larger than he is. | 
 
 What species is Giric? If it is a bipedal species then a giant bug the same height should definitely be described as a giant, if not huge.
 
 If you think this bug 10 feets high, then it should be at least 25 feet long!
 
  | 
 
 The point is not whether or not something is giant based on it's size, but the GM actually having the ability to decide what descriptives to use rather than just being given a descriptive. Having a size to work with gives us the choice what descriptives to work with based on the characters themselves.
 
 Edit: Sorry, forgot to address this in the initial response. You asked what Giric's species is, the answer is you'd never find it in any sourcebook or on Wookiepedia. It's a species I made up called the Yegoglar.
 _________________
 FLUFFY for President!!!!
 
 Wanted Poster
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |