View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mshute Cadet
![Cadet Cadet](images/ranks/cadet.gif)
Joined: 09 Sep 2021 Posts: 10 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:49 am Post subject: Vampire: The Masquerade Conversion |
|
|
Back in the 90s, my game group noticed a lot of similarities between WEG's d6 Star Wars system and White Wolf's d10 World of Darkness system. They both used dice pools. They both used Health levels and let characters "soak" damage. They both had a "complications" mechanic. "Humanity" was the mirror image of "Dark Side Points".
We found the d10 system to be more elegant and versatile though. It was faster and easier to count successes rather than add up all the dice. Successes could be converted to bonus dice or difficulty modifications 1-to-1. The skills were more cinematic; a pilot could fly a speeder just as well as a star fighter or transport. We tried playing a Star Wars game with the d10 rules, and it worked really well.
Over the last 20 years, we've been refining and developing our homebrew conversion as the prequels and sequels were released. We expanded Force Powers and Skills. We developed native mechanics for vehicle combat. We even came up with some great rules for "cinematic duels". When "The Mandalorian" came out, I started pulling together all of our different iterations into a single document. I've finally finished that project.
I don't know if anyone else outside of my game group would have any interest in this conversion or not, but I thought I'd make it available just in case. You can find the PDF here - http://laurelcadre.org/Star_Wars_WEG_to_WoD_Conversion.pdf
If anyone does bother to look it over, I'd love to hear what you think.
-Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Whill Dark Lord of the Jedi (Owner/Admin)
![](images/avatars/gallery/_Whill/Emperor+Vader.jpg)
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 10315 Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA, Earth, The Solar System, The Milky Way Galaxy
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for sharing your alternate game system.
I briefly entertained the idea of changing to a d10 system because the difficulty numbers are based 5s and 10s – the number of dice rolled and the difficulty ranges are irrelevant to each other in D6 (5s and 10s were only chosen because they are easy to remember). But then I remembered that the average roll of a d10 is 5.5, so there wasn't any real advantage to changing from d6 which is 3.5. To line things up, I instead when the direction of shifting the difficulty ranges to being based on 3.5s and 7s, so the number of dice rolled directly corresponds to difficulty ranges now.
And regarding it being success-based, WEG published a D6 has a version of that too. It was only used for two published games, DC Universe and Hercules & Xena. The mean joke about it is that it is D6 for the arithmetically inept. Personally, I find counting pips to be fun, and I've been blessed with never having any players that had too much trouble with it. I feel you lose too much nuance with a success-based game, but that is just my preference. _________________ *
Site Map
Forum Guidelines
Registration/Log-In Help
The Rancor Pit Library
Star Wars D6 Damage |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mshute Cadet
![Cadet Cadet](images/ranks/cadet.gif)
Joined: 09 Sep 2021 Posts: 10 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I'll grant that d6 offers more flexibility for setting difficulties. With a success-based d10, you can fall into the "6 seems too low but 7 seems too high" trap. It was adding up all those dice that really shifted our preference to success based systems though.
When we ran d6, the most entertaining part of the night was watching the vein throb in the engineering major's forehead as the history and English majors tried to figure out if the seven dice they'd just rolled added up to 18 or not. Even the most math-averse in our group could figure out many d10s landed on 6 or higher. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
MrNexx Rear Admiral
![Rear Admiral Rear Admiral](images/ranks/rearAdmiral.gif)
![](images/avatars/gallery/WEG/Quixotic_Jedi.jpg)
Joined: 25 Mar 2016 Posts: 2248 Location: San Antonio
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
mshute wrote: | Yeah, I'll grant that d6 offers more flexibility for setting difficulties. With a success-based d10, you can fall into the "6 seems too low but 7 seems too high" trap. It was adding up all those dice that really shifted our preference to success based systems though.
When we ran d6, the most entertaining part of the night was watching the vein throb in the engineering major's forehead as the history and English majors tried to figure out if the seven dice they'd just rolled added up to 18 or not. Even the most math-averse in our group could figure out many d10s landed on 6 or higher. |
Shadowrun's 4th edition did something similar to what VtR did... setting a set target number on the die, and counting successes, with difficulty managed by changing the dice pool.
So, your Blaster skill is 6D, and you roll your dice and get 2 that are 5 or 6. You therefore get 2 hits. However, if you're taking a really long shot, you might get a 2D penalty, and therefore only roll 4D, making success less likely.
Now, this works a LOT better when you're adding dice pools... In SR, you usually need about 6-10 dice to be relatively competent, but that works because you add your Attribute to your Skill, which are two separate numbers. To pull that off in d6, you'd need to divorce the skill rating from the attribute rating, except at building dice pools (So, you'd have 4D Dexterity and 2D Blaster, which would make a 6D dice pool, rather than having a 6D blaster rating).
These divorced numbers can somewhat facilitate cross-attribute play... for example, I might rule that the sniper shot you're taking isn't Dex+Blaster, but Perception+Blaster, or that identifying a blaster aimed at you (to use Cracken's infamous "this blaster has a long cooldown cycle" trick) is Knowledge + Blaster. But these lower ratings, RAW, would also mean that dice pools increase faster... even if you can't reasonably increase your attributes, if you have 3D Dex and 1D blaster, it gets really cheap to increase blaster (3 CP to get to 2D for a 5D pool, rather than 12 CP to get to a 5D blaster rating). _________________ "I've Seen Your Daily Routine. You Are Not Busy!"
“We're going to win this war, not by fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”
http://rpgcrank.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mshute Cadet
![Cadet Cadet](images/ranks/cadet.gif)
Joined: 09 Sep 2021 Posts: 10 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MrNexx wrote: | Shadowrun's 4th edition did something similar to what VtR did... setting a set target number on the die, and counting successes, with difficulty managed by changing the dice pool.
So, your Blaster skill is 6D, and you roll your dice and get 2 that are 5 or 6. You therefore get 2 hits. However, if you're taking a really long shot, you might get a 2D penalty, and therefore only roll 4D, making success less likely.
Now, this works a LOT better when you're adding dice pools... In SR, you usually need about 6-10 dice to be relatively competent, but that works because you add your Attribute to your Skill, which are two separate numbers. To pull that off in d6, you'd need to divorce the skill rating from the attribute rating, except at building dice pools (So, you'd have 4D Dexterity and 2D Blaster, which would make a 6D dice pool, rather than having a 6D blaster rating).
These divorced numbers can somewhat facilitate cross-attribute play... for example, I might rule that the sniper shot you're taking isn't Dex+Blaster, but Perception+Blaster, or that identifying a blaster aimed at you (to use Cracken's infamous "this blaster has a long cooldown cycle" trick) is Knowledge + Blaster. But these lower ratings, RAW, would also mean that dice pools increase faster... even if you can't reasonably increase your attributes, if you have 3D Dex and 1D blaster, it gets really cheap to increase blaster (3 CP to get to 2D for a 5D pool, rather than 12 CP to get to a 5D blaster rating). |
Yeah, that's one of the things I always liked about dice pool systems over d20 systems. You have the option to modify the difficulty or the pool. Or both I suppose. In the "World of Darkness" d10 I always like that the skill was independent from the Attribute for exactly the reason you described. Very versatile.
My group never played ShadowRun; we're big into CyberPunck 2020, which is another add-up-all-the-dice system. Maybe we should give ShadowRun a try. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
MrNexx Rear Admiral
![Rear Admiral Rear Admiral](images/ranks/rearAdmiral.gif)
![](images/avatars/gallery/WEG/Quixotic_Jedi.jpg)
Joined: 25 Mar 2016 Posts: 2248 Location: San Antonio
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mshute wrote: | My group never played ShadowRun; we're big into CyberPunck 2020, which is another add-up-all-the-dice system. Maybe we should give ShadowRun a try. |
Only if you like really, really, REALLY crunchy.
There's a reason I converted it to Savage Worlds. I've played 1st-4th editions, and every one is a mess. Some great stuff, great world building, but a mechanical mess. _________________ "I've Seen Your Daily Routine. You Are Not Busy!"
“We're going to win this war, not by fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”
http://rpgcrank.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|